Uganda Prisons Service (UPS) has finally addressed the brewing storm surrounding the food situation of Dr. Kizza Besigye, a prominent opposition leader and a four-time presidential candidate.
Dr. Besigye’s food saga erupted into a hot-button issue after reports emerged that he had declined meals provided by prison authorities.
The story quickly gained traction, with social media platforms buzzing with speculations, conspiracy theories, and fiery debates. Was it a silent protest? A health precaution? Or something more sinister?
Supporters and critics demanded answers, with some alleging mistreatment while others questioned the narrative’s authenticity.
During a press briefing on Monday, UPS spokesperson Frank Baine attempted to set the record straight. Baine confirmed that Dr. Besigye had indeed declined prison meals but stressed that this was a personal choice rather than a reflection of the quality or safety of the food provided.
“We respect the rights of every inmate, including their dietary preferences,” Baine remarked. “Dr. Besigye has chosen to have his meals delivered by his family, which is well within his rights under our regulations.”
While Baine’s tone was calm, his words left a lingering sense of ambiguity. The statement may have answered some questions but raised many others. Why would someone refuse state-provided meals unless there was an underlying issue?
Was it a subtle protest against incarceration conditions or a mere personal preference? Legal and human rights experts have weighed in, emphasizing the importance of transparency in prison conditions.
“The right to adequate food and nutrition is fundamental,” said Dr. James Ssekandi, a criminologist at Makerere University. “This incident could be an opportunity to audit the broader system, ensuring that all detainees not just high-profile ones receive proper treatment.”
Besigye was kidnapped from Nairobi together with his ally Obed Lutale and arraigned before the court martial, on charges of possession of firearms and treachery.
The two have refused to take plea, challenging the jurisdiction of the court. Their lawyers have insisted that their clients do not fall under the purview of the “military tribunal.”
On the 7th of January 2025, one of the lawyers Eron Kiiza was charged contempt of the court and sentenced to 9 months.
